Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) Resend Validation Email


3 Pages  1 2 3  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Thread Rating: 0 votes, 0.00 average.  Rate:  
  • Thread Rating: 0 votes, 0.00 average.  Rate:  
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
> Necro-posting, Keeps forums alive
mike_lancer
Posted: Sep 3 2009, 12:33 AM
Quote Post


WME Wangan Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Member No.: 5,758
Joined: Aug 28th 2009
Location: Bali,Indonesia





QUOTE (K&S<3 @ 51 minutes, 41 seconds ago)
look at it this way, If people can't search the forum warn them, dont add to their warn level, if they continue NOT to search or ask a mod then warn them, really sometimes the search doesnt bring the right thread sometimes, also if the forums had tags section there wouldn't need to have so many versions. I think tags need to be introduced.

yup..i'm agree.. happy.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
RUBY
Posted: Sep 3 2009, 06:44 AM
Quote Post


WME Banned Member
**********

Group: Core Members
Posts: 5,773
Member No.: 4,951
Joined: Apr 2nd 2009
Location: CBD Melbourne Park, Australia





QUOTE (mike_lancer @ 6 hours, 11 minutes ago)
yup..i'm agree.. happy.gif

hope it gets looked into.
PMUsers WebsiteMSN
Top
Protoman
Posted: Sep 3 2009, 12:26 PM
Quote Post


WME King Tiger
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,334
Member No.: 4,735
Joined: Mar 3rd 2009
Location: Update Profile





QUOTE (Geo @ Aug 31 2009, 05:44 AM)
Unfortunately no one who tell's people to read the rules, read the rules themselves.

I was just thinking about that...

not seeing the rules, I can understand because it's hidden on a thread...

but replying on a thread dedicated to necroposting and implying (implying... I'm careful to use the word implying) it's against the rules when just one or 2 pages before in the same thread saying it's ok...

huh? O_o

But as for the warning on making new unnecessary threads, it's already on a per-occurrence evaluation. At least from what I've seen so far.
PMEmail Poster
Top
DOHC
Posted: Sep 3 2009, 02:13 PM
Quote Post


i like nuts
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,846
Member No.: 374
Joined: Jul 7th 2007
Location: Update Profile





QUOTE
but replying on a thread dedicated to necroposting and implying (implying... I'm careful to use the word implying) it's against the rules when just one or 2 pages before in the same thread saying it's ok...


The world wouldn't be so complicating

QUOTE
But as for the warning on making new unnecessary threads, it's already on a per-occurrence evaluation. At least from what I've seen so far.


Doesnt matter since only the MODS can interpret the way they want to either right/wrong.

This post has been edited by DOHC on Sep 3 2009, 02:14 PM
PMEmail Poster
Top
RUBY
Posted: Sep 8 2009, 12:46 AM
Quote Post


WME Banned Member
**********

Group: Core Members
Posts: 5,773
Member No.: 4,951
Joined: Apr 2nd 2009
Location: CBD Melbourne Park, Australia





sometimes mods even don't follow the rules. but we can't warn them.
PMUsers WebsiteMSN
Top
DOHC
Posted: Sep 8 2009, 07:22 PM
Quote Post


i like nuts
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,846
Member No.: 374
Joined: Jul 7th 2007
Location: Update Profile





QUOTE (K&S<3 @ Today, 12:46 AM)
sometimes mods even don't follow the rules. but we can't warn them.

Well its the whole biased argument
PMEmail Poster
Top

Topic Options 3 Pages  1 2 3  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll