|
Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Rate: - Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Rate:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Project MA70, The start of my project car.
damanwitdaMZR |
|
WME Wangan Runner
    
Group: Members
Posts: 46
Member No.: 5,060
Joined: Apr 17th 2009
Location: Newark,NJ

|
I am new here, not trying to be a smartass, but i happen to have experience with the M series engines. i can help you with the cams, and throttle bodies. if you can grind cams, then i think that you can advance your exhaust from the stock 230, to 242. for the intake leave it stock. will work well with a 8:3:1 compression and will give the top-end needed to reach 170 MPH. but you will have to reprogram your ECU, Fuel injectors upgrade to 42 lbs. i did this with my old MX83 Cressida, with 10:6:1 compression, and Individual throttle bodies. also i swapped the crank to the JDM 6M ( not to look cool, but because there was no heavy counterweights on cylinder 2 and 5 (not sure about 5, maybe 3 it's been a long time  .) i also fixed the troublesome gasket problem, i used longer heads studs.
|
|
|
JDMMA70 |
|
Request Title - PM Mods
         
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 786
Member No.: 123
Joined: Apr 7th 2007
Location: Houston, TX

|
QUOTE (damanwitdaMZR @ Today, 2:22 AM) | I am new here, not trying to be a smartass, but i happen to have experience with the M series engines.
i can help you with the cams, and throttle bodies.
if you can grind cams, then i think that you can advance your exhaust from the stock 230, to 242.
for the intake leave it stock.
will work well with a 8:3:1 compression and will give the top-end needed to reach 170 MPH.
but you will have to reprogram your ECU, Fuel injectors upgrade to 42 lbs.
i did this with my old MX83 Cressida, with 10:6:1 compression, and Individual throttle bodies.
also i swapped the crank to the JDM 6M ( not to look cool, but because there was no heavy counterweights on cylinder 2 and 5 (not sure about 5, maybe 3 it's been a long time .)
i also fixed the troublesome gasket problem, i used longer heads studs. |
Sounds like you know your stuff i was actually going with 264 cam regrinds since itll work a little better with the 20G turbo im currently running and later on a T-66, as for fuel ill be running a piggy back when i get bigger injectors so i got that covered. The 6M crank doesnt have counter weights on cyl 2 and 5 you are correct there sir. Btw are you the one that built that insane white Cressida that reved to high heaven? The main problem with the 6M crank is at higher RPMS theres alot of vibrations GT-R's have a problem with this as well. It makes good for revving faster and higher, and its really hard to find a 6M crank that doesnt have a lot of wear and tear. I had a 6M but decided to trade for a 7M crank just to be safe. *Update maintenance*  Oil change time This post has been edited by JDMMA70 on Apr 17 2009, 01:45 PM
|
|
|
damanwitdaMZR |
|
WME Wangan Runner
    
Group: Members
Posts: 46
Member No.: 5,060
Joined: Apr 17th 2009
Location: Newark,NJ

|
QUOTE | Btw are you the one that built that insane white Cressida that reved to high heaven? |
i built three 7M-GEU, one that went into a MX83, and two others I sold them to people who asked me to build them.
but the MX83 was Silver not white, and it revved till 10K RPM safely.
as far as your turbo setup stick with the 20G, it can boost up at lower RPM, from 2000 RPM. the T66 is good for about 600HP, the peak flow is 70-72 pounds/minute.
so if you'll be turning up the boost, better stick with the TD06-20G, less expensive and more reliable.
264 deg seems a bit to high for your setup, you need low end power especially when you are running hi boost, 264 will delay your boost too much, it will be like a T5 volvo, good mid-high power but crappy low end.
as for the piggyback, it's simply not my style, because i try to keep the voltage/amperage consumption low, that way less power will be drawn to drive the alternator under load.
|
|
|
JDMMA70 |
|
Request Title - PM Mods
         
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 786
Member No.: 123
Joined: Apr 7th 2007
Location: Houston, TX

|
QUOTE (damanwitdaMZR @ 1 hour, 0 minutes ago) | i built three 7M-GEU, one that went into a MX83, and two others I sold them to people who asked me to build them.
but the MX83 was Silver not white, and it revved till 10K RPM safely.
as far as your turbo setup stick with the 20G, it can boost up at lower RPM, from 2000 RPM. the T66 is good for about 600HP, the peak flow is 70-72 pounds/minute.
so if you'll be turning up the boost, better stick with the TD06-20G, less expensive and more reliable.
264 deg seems a bit to high for your setup, you need low end power especially when you are running hi boost, 264 will delay your boost too much, it will be like a T5 volvo, good mid-high power but crappy low end.
as for the piggyback, it's simply not my style, because i try to keep the voltage/amperage consumption low, that way less power will be drawn to drive the alternator under load. |
Well to be honest my cam options include stock, 250 and 264 regrinds, of the 7M's ive seen run 264's they make full boost by 2800-3200rpms and pull the power a lot more in the 3000-6500 range. The car is being built for speed, losing a little low end isnt that bad, not as bad as the 7M i rode in with 272's slow out of boost but at 25psi things got crazy, the lag time was a bit to long for me so i figured id meet in the middle somewhere. Yeah i plan to stay with the 20G for quite some time one it was free and two its a good turbo. Goals are listed somewhere in the thread to lazy to go and look. I eventually will upgrade to a GReddy T78 kit and most likely motec when the time comes.
|
|
|
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
|
|