|
Thread Rating: 5 votes, 4.20 average. Rate: - Thread Rating: 5 votes, 4.20 average. Rate:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Post your Automotive Shots!!
GT3 RS |
|
WME King Cat
         
Group: Core Members
Posts: 5,050
Member No.: 5,053
Joined: Apr 16th 2009
Location: DFW

|
|
|
|
Bloody_Monday |
|
Request Title - PM Mods
         
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 708
Member No.: 5,943
Joined: Sep 29th 2009
Location: Vienna, Austria... No MT there.....

|
QUOTE (GT3 RS @ 52 minutes, 30 seconds ago) | Ive been telling myself I need to do that,but I think I need to upgrade my lens and get a bit more used to it first. Im cross-eyed,so its a bit hard looking through the viewfinder.
I did attempt a shot of the rear of the 458 Challenge with the field across the road (visible in the Scuderia picture) as the background. But unfortunately,the car was out of focus. Doing things like this is something I still havent gotten down. Most of my front pictures of the Speedster came out blurry as well. The one posted was taken with my iPhone.
What lens did you use on the 2 you posted? |
I used the 24-105mm f/4 L lens. It's a $1k lens but I would recommend this lens only if you are seriously into photo but also video as well. If it's only photos, then the 24-70 f/2.8 L is the recommended choice.
Obviously these lenses are WAAAAY out of your budget I suspect. I would consider a fixed (non-zoomable) lens for an upgrade like a 35mm or 50mm fixed focal length. Non zoom lens is a great way to improve your composition because you're restricting yourself and are forced to move. You will hate it first but when you get a nice shot, you will love it. As a very famous photographer (Ansel Adams) once said "A good photograph is knowing where to stand."
For an upgrade, the Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 (around $300) or/and the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 (around $130) will be my recommended choice. They offer excellent image quality for the price but the downside is that they are hard to use.
This post has been edited by Bloody_Monday on May 15 2011, 02:04 PM
|
|
|
Bloody_Monday |
|
Request Title - PM Mods
         
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 708
Member No.: 5,943
Joined: Sep 29th 2009
Location: Vienna, Austria... No MT there.....

|
QUOTE (GT3 RS @ 19 minutes, 28 seconds ago) | A bit curious. Those 2 you suggested,what do you mean by "hard to use"? |
I don't know much about the 35mm f/2.0 because I don't have it but as far as user reviews said, it's slow to focus, feels cheap and is really noisy when focusing. I do have the 50mm f/1.8 and from my experience, it's a love and hate lens. At f/1.8, it can produce very sharp and very beautiful images with very good background blur and gets even sharper at f/2.8 but I hate it because it's very noisy (like R2D2 having a seizure), misses a lot at f/1.8 (4 out of 10 photos are in focus), on a 7D it's equivalent to a 80mm lens so you have a much narrower field of view and feels totally cheap. Everything is plastic. I often use manual focus on the 50mm so I don't need to recompose the shot at f/1.8.
This post has been edited by Bloody_Monday on May 15 2011, 02:44 PM
|
|
|
Blue-Sensei |
|
I have no idea what I'm doing
         
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,074
Member No.: 7,637
Joined: Jan 16th 2011
Location: Virginia

|
|
|
|
seano |
|
evoX best evo
         
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3,423
Member No.: 4,514
Joined: Jan 26th 2009
Location: sydney

|
|
|
|
GT3 RS |
|
WME King Cat
         
Group: Core Members
Posts: 5,050
Member No.: 5,053
Joined: Apr 16th 2009
Location: DFW

|
|
|
|
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
|
|